Posts by author:

ThePseudonym

YouTube Preview Image

I don’t really know why this works, but it does.  This mashup album, created by the Nashville-based DJ and producer, Wick-it the Instigator, fuses the best of 2010 – tracks from both Brothers and Son of Chico Dusty – in a surprisingly successful blend of blues-rock and hip hop.  Despite the bizarre meeting of genres (which, musically and historically shouldn’t be that bizarre) what really makes the album kick is the synchronicity of the songs; any Girl Talk wannabe can throw some shit together and make it catchy, but in nearly every one of the songs on Brothers of Chico, the beat, the singing and the rapping are integrated nearly seamlessly.  The result is an album that hides the fact that it is a remix and ends up sounding like an original.

Summary: the tracks on this album have the catchiness of the originals, the synergy of a mashup, and the nuances of a whole new production.  If you want to check out the album, you can download the whole thing for free here.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

{ 1 comment }

Join us:

RSS twitter Facebook
YouTube Preview Image

I’m not typically a sucker for old French shit (save for a nice bottle of wine), but this song never fails to melt my soul.  Edith Piaf is one of the greats (if not the greatest) of 20th century music and she does it all with a class and spirit that can reach all audiences.  Most know her for her most famous tune, “La Vie en Rose”, while others for the theme of Inception, “Non Je ne Regrette Rien”, but “Padam Padam” is a lesser known gem that speaks volumes.  The tune is at once romping and eerie, while the lyrics espouse a kind of unpretentious sadness that is so rare.  Translated lyrics below.  Enjoy:

This tune which haunts me day and night
This tune wasn’t written today
It comes from as far away as I come
Trawled around by a hundred thousand musicains
One day this tune will drive me mad
A hundred times I’ve wanted to say why
But it’s interrupted me
It always speaks before i do
And its voice drowns out my voice

Padam…padam…padam
It comes running up behind me
Padam…padam…padam
It plays me the trick of: do you remember
C’est un air qui me montre du doigt
Et je traîne après moi comme un drole d’erreur
Cet air qui sait tout par cœur

It says: “Remember your loves
Remember cos it’s your turn
There’s no reason why you shouldn’t cry
Encumbered with your memories
“And me, I see again those who remain
My 20 years make the drum beat
I see the succession of gestures flash by
All the comedy of love
To this tune which just keeps playing

Des “je t’aime” de quatorze-juillet
Padam…padam…padam…
The ‘always’s which we buy on the cheap
Des “veux-tu” en voilà par paquets
Et tout ca pour tomber juste au coin d’la rue
Sur l’air qui m’a reconnue

Listen to the commotion which it causes me
Comme si tout mon passé défilait

You need to keep some sorrow for later
I’ve got scores full in this tune which beats.
Which beats like a wooden heart

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

{ 0 comments }

Join us:

RSS twitter Facebook

The Pseudonym discusses the effects of technology on communities, how they’re formed, maintained and where they exist.


The term “community” has, in many respects, changed dramatically in recent years. This has primarily been due to technological innovations, which allow physically distant people to communicate and interact in more involved ways.

A hundred years ago, one’s community was restricted to the area around them; the people you interacted with were all in one place – most likely, all in one town. Sure, you could send a letter to someone in a neighboring area, but that would take a great deal of time, and you would need to know the person, or it would be really strange (imagine writing a personal letter to a completely random address). With the advent of the telegraph, and then the telephone, this became much easier. Interaction was instantaneous and allowed for quick feedback, thereby replicating in-person interactions.

Instant messaging and video chat creates an entirely different dimension of interaction, and allows people to have a back and forth as if having a conversation in person. With instant messaging, you can literally stay in a virtual “place” for hours – essentially opening yourself up to conversations with friends, as you would if you were sitting in a communal area. The internet has provided an immense framework, not only for interaction with prior relations, but for interactions with those who share similar interests, mindsets, etc. With a phone, you have a specific number you can call to keep in touch with previous contacts. With the advent of Chat Roulette, for example, you can contact and interact with someone who you have never met before.

Unlike previous technologies, which are useful for maintaining one’s community, the most recent developments have allowed people to create communities. In the computer program, “Second Life”, users can create avatars through which they can quite literally live a second life. The “Second Life” world is incredibly expansive and intricate and is becoming even more detailed. With these capabilities, literal space is no longer necessary in creating community, but a more metaphorical space certainly is. When you log in to Facebook, it’s analogous to entering a room. There are people – your friends – with whom you can communicate. It is a common space, which provides the means to communicate.

Whether or not this is the right direction – whether it leads to greater happiness and satisfaction – is a question I’ll leave to you, but it definitely provides more choice to the individual. One can interact with anyone in the world instantaneously with nothing but a computer and an internet connection.

Do you think technology has impacted the notion of “community”? How so?

Related Posts:

{ 0 comments }

Join us:

RSS twitter Facebook

Musings

by ThePseudonym on October 30, 2010

in Learn

I am a fairly opinionated individual.  And I typically don’t have trouble taking a stance; one day in my ethics course, however, my professor presented us with the issue of euthanasia in a very challenging way.  We were shown one particular video where a man, named Dax Cowell, was being kept alive after being caught in an explosion.  The accident left him with burns covering 90% of his body, and Dax described his situation as being so painful that he begged the doctors to let him die.  Dax, 28 at the time, was in terrible condition and was obviously in an extraordinary amount of pain.  The answer seemed obvious: if you see a wounded animal it is your ethical duty to put it out if its misery.  The same should be done with Dax.

We were then introduced to the case of the Netherlands, where euthanasia and “doctor assisted suicide” have been legal for some time.  The laws there maintain that a patient has a right to die if he or she is in “unbearable pain” or if such pain is certain in the future.  This pain, however, is not limited to physiological illnesses, but includes the suffering that comes with clinical anxiety or depression.  We have a responsibility to prevent suicides, don’t we?  If your friend was depressed, should you be allowed to let them die?  Should you do nothing to help because it is their “right” to die?

I know it’s a heavy subject, but it was on my mind, and I can’t seem to sort my thoughts out about the issue.  I was wondering if anyone has any insight / personal experiences, etc.

Related Posts:

{ 1 comment }

Join us:

RSS twitter Facebook

Performers love giving praise to their audience during or after acts.  They often credit the crowd for the energy and passion they bring to the show.  I don’t think that there’s any doubt that performances are influenced by the spirit of the audience.  In the case of the ideal live performance, however, the audience members do more than “influence” – they makes music.

In some of Cannonball Adderley’s recordings the crowd literally punctuates the beat of the songs with “hey”s and “alright”s.  These shout-outs act to augment the tunes like drum fills.  In “Mercy, Mercy, Mercy”, for example, as the piano and drum start the beat, Cannonball preaches to the audience that “sometimes we don’t know what to do when adversity takes over”.  Immediately, an audience member answers him in a singing yell: “I get on my knees and ah [sic] pray!”.  Just as the introduction speech provides the lyrics to the slow start of the track, the audience gets right in there, and the monologue becomes conversational.  In my mind, this is how music was meant to be played and enjoyed.  All it takes are a few bold souls to start it off, and the Cannonball Adderley Quintet quickly turns into an orchestra, with “Mercy, Mercy, Mercy” becoming a symphony of sorts.

YouTube Preview Image

In Sack O’Woe, my favorite tune by the Quintet, the volume and force of the song slowly rises and falls for the full ten minutes of the song.  The tune builds and eventually rises to full force at around six minutes in, at which point the audience seemingly takes the song into their own hands.  Between the crowd screaming out “Right there, right there!” and the consistent clapping, the listener gleans that the music belongs to the audience as much as it does to the band.  That is the kind of shared experience that should define all music.  It is certainly a quality present in all good performances.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

{ 0 comments }

Join us:

RSS twitter Facebook

DRINK CHEAP: TheNewConfusion at Soldier McGee

August 18, 2010 Live
DRINK CHEAP: TheNewConfusion at Soldier McGee

  Dearest Loyal Readers, We’ve been going steady for two years, and well, we think it’s time to take this relationship to the next level, and to prove it, we have a present for you. To celebrate two whole years on the wide world web, TheNewConfusion is throwing a birthday party (hats optional) this Thursday, [...]

Read the full article →

The Beatles vs. Nine Inch Nails

August 13, 2010 Uncategorized

Can you touch The Beatles? I mean, can you even remaster their albums? Seems like heresy to make a mashup with their songs – especially with one by the Nine Inch Nails – but that is exactly what goes happens when “Come Together” and “Closer” are overlayed. The beats and basslines of the two songs [...]

Read the full article →

Music and the Mind: Music Makes You Smarter, Better (Part 3)

July 21, 2010 Learn

Also check out the first and second installments of the Music and the Mind series Neurologists have been stating for some time that everything we do changes our brain chemistry, and thus our “state of mind”; each experience alters neuronal connections and the strength of those connections. Emotionally powerful events (such as trauma, exuberance,etc.), in [...]

Read the full article →

Music and the Mind: Musical High (Part 2)

June 29, 2010 Learn
Music and the Mind: Musical High (Part 2)

This is Part 2 in ThePseudonym’s series. Allow us to recommend taking a moment to read Part 1 here. If I asked you to whistle your favorite tune, I bet you could with surprising accuracy. In a unique and elegantly simple experiment, the neurologist Daniel Levitin did just that. He found that recordings of random [...]

Read the full article →

Music and the Mind: What Makes Rock Rock? (Part 1)

June 22, 2010 Uncategorized
Music and the Mind: What Makes Rock Rock? (Part 1)

You know those chills you get when listening to your favorite song? Yeah, it’s like that, but about a hundred times more intense. In 1969, while practicing Rachmaninoff’s Third Piano Concerto, commonly known as Rach 3 (see below), David Helfgott suffered a debilitating, psychotic break with reality. Widely recognized as a child prodigy, and often [...]

Read the full article →